Saturday, November 3, 2012

NEW & IMPROVED - Same Great Taste, Higher Constitution!


Action Planning Template
Goal: I will determine the extent to which the overall performance of struggling readers be increased through the implementation of a multi-faceted reading intervention program?
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start-End
Needed Resources
Evaluation
1.    Determine eligible students for the program
Mrs. Shannon Allen, Principal; Mrs. Jenny Angelo, Reading Department Chair; Mrs. Ava Batiste, Counselor; Mr. Jeffrey Farley, Reading Interventionist/ Researcher
May 2012-July 2012
STAAR raw scores, STAR scaled scores
Students who exhibited low performance on both assessments will be placed in the program. Remaining spots will be filled based upon Fall 2012 Universal Screen (STAR) data. Number of students selected for sample is held at 63 in order to accommodate those new, incoming or previously unidentified low-performing students. Cap is based on maintaining an approximately 1:18 (or less) teacher-student ratio.
2.    Institute class periods during which the interven-tions will take place
Mrs. Shannon Allen Mrs. Ava Batiste, Mr. Jeffrey Farley
May 2012-June 2012
Master Schedule
Evaluate Master Schedule to assess the possibility of removing 8th grade ELAR students to other teachers in order to make Mr. Farley’s class periods available for Reading Improvement classes
3.    Conduct Universal Screen
Mr. Jeffrey Farley, Reading Department teachers
August 31, 2012-September 7, 2012
Campus STAR Reading subscription, computer labs (3 labs/3 days)
All students on the campus will take the assessment in order to verify placement of children from previous assessment data and to fill spots in the classes with as many other students from the bottom of the field as the class capacity allows. Look particularly at incoming 6th graders for placement.

NOTE REGARDING UNIVERSAL SCREEN: In September 2012, a total of 811 students were tested. 26 students, from our total of 837 enrolled at that time, were not tested in the screen due to enrollment in Life Skills, Home-bound, or Alternative Campus Placement at the time of the screen.
.
4.    Begin daily interventions using audio books
Mr. Jeffrey Farley
September 6, 2012-April 24, 2013
Taped books, PlayAways, cassette players, headphones, power (strips, cords, etc.), Campus Accelerated Reader (AR) subscription
Students will work four days each week (M-Th) reading for 40 minutes each day. Remaining time will be spent documenting the day’s reading on the summary bookmark created for that book. Student reading will be tracked through the AR Reading Practice quizzes – point totals, average book level, and average quiz score will be assessed and documented.
5.    Administer STAR Reading assessment weekly to monitor progress
Mr. Jeffrey Farley
September 14, 2012-May 3, 2013
Campus STAR Reading subscription, computer lab (every Friday, all year – administer STAR 2nd-4th Fridays of every month)
The STAR assessment will be used to determine starting Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in terms of AR Book Level to help students choose appropriately comfortable/challenging independent reading material. Students will also track their own scaled score from the weekly assessments on a paper graph in their folder – this will help them self-assess their own progress and drive them to keep reaching.
6.    Following analysis of Universal Screen data, low-perform-ing sixth grade students are added to the program
Mr. Jeffrey Farley, Mrs. Shannon Allen, Mrs. Ava Batiste
September 18, 2012
Master Schedule, STAR Universal Screen data
Fourteen new students from the sixth grade are entered into the program bringing the total Tier II sample group to 77 students. These 77 students will receive interventions and progress monitoring until either they achieve three consecutive scaled scores at or above benchmark or the end of the school year, whichever comes first.
7.    Administer Istation Indicators of Progress (ISIP) assessment
Mr. Jeffrey Farley
October 12, 2012-May 10, 2013
District Istation subscription, computer labs (1st Friday of every month), headphones
The ISIP assessment will be a second diagnostic tool to help understand specific problem areas for each child in the program. The assessment will also inform the Istation practice platform so that each student receives interventions appropriate to his or her level/area(s) of difficulty
8.    Begin taking AR Vocabulary quizzes immediately following AR Reading Practice quizzes
Mr. Jeffrey Farley
October 25, 2012-May 31, 2013
Campus AR subscription
Based on preliminary examination of ISIP data, many students are struggling specifically with vocabulary and word analysis.  While the vocabulary quizzes in AR are based on the level of the book, and those book levels are often well-below grade level, the vocabulary quiz offers another data point for the dashboard and an opportunity to remediate students when performance of these assessments is low.
9.    Administer Student Reading Survey
Mr. Jeffrey Farley
November 2, 2012




Google Survey modified from 2011 Concordia University Research study survey component
I will build the online survey using the CU survey component as a guide and administer the online survey after weekly progress monitoring in the lab on 11/2/2012. Survey data will be assessed as immediately as possible to determine whether factors within the students might need to be addressed during the program.
10.  Begin using “Reading with ISIP” computer- based intervention program
Mr. Jeffrey Farley
November 2, 2012-May 31, 2013
District Istation subscription, computer labs (every Friday of the school year)
Students will spend any time after completing either the STAR or the ISIP on the Istation reading practice platform. Performance in this environment will be assessed at least every three weeks for grade reporting purposes and to discover the nature of the students’ use and priority areas as determined by performance in the practices.
11.  Administer Parent Survey
Mr. Jeffrey Farley
November 9, 2012
Google Survey or Survey Monkey survey
The parent survey will focus on Istation, primarily, but also on the students’ attitudes toward school as perceived by those at home. With regard Istation, I hope to learn whether parents are using the resource, how the feel about it, and what would make it easier for them do so if they are not.
12.  Administer mid-year STAR Universal Screen
Mr. Jeffrey Farley, Reading department teachers
January 7, 2013-January 18, 2013
Campus STAR Reading subscription, computer labs (3 labs/3 days)
Mid-year Universal Screen will look for students who may have dropped during the first half of the year or entered the school during that time but after the initial Screen. All students will, again, be compared against every other student on the campus.
13.  Begin promoting STAAR Incentive program
Campus Incentive Committee
January 7, 2013-April 26, 2013
Box Tops for Education funding, School Dance & other special event funds to purchase performance incentive prizes
Incentive Committee will begin promoting STAAR Incentive giveaways to be drawn on the last day of the school year with incentive drawing opportunities tied to STAAR performance. This program will be used to motivate students in the sample to redouble their efforts in the program and to achieve benchmark scores in Progress Monitoring assessments.
14.  Administer STAAR Reading assessment
Entire Marshall MS faculty
April 3, 2013 (8th grade) and April 24, 2013 (6th & 7th grade)
State-provided Assessment
The STAAR Assessment will be one of the major, overall assessments of whether students improved throughout the course of the year. By comparing scaled scores with the 2012 scaled scores (to be reported in January 2013), we can begin to assess overall improvement.
15.  Administer end-of-year STAR Universal Screen
Mr. Jeffrey Farley, Reading department teachers
May 1, 2013-May 15, 2013
Campus STAR Reading subscription, computer labs (3 labs/3 days)
End-of-year Universal Screen will provide a second assessment of overall reading progress based on scaled score, grade equivalency increases, and increases in Instructional Reading Levels (IRLs). All students will, again, be compared against every other student on the campus.
16.  Make recommend-dations for placement for 2013-2014 school year based upon preliminary STAAR data and Spring Universal Screen data
Mr. Jeffrey Farley, Mrs. Shannon Allen, Mrs. Ava Batiste
May 15, 2013-June 7, 2013
Disaggregated STAAR data, STAR Universal Screen data, Istation data (where available), Master Schedule
Reassess Master Schedule to determine whether more sections of Reading Improvement are necessary/possible. Analyze assessment data comparing STAAR Performance, Spring Universal Screen data, and Istation data (most current, where available). Assess number of slots in Reading Improvement classes for next school year, determine need for returning students, and determine a reasonable (large as possible) number of seats to save for incoming sixth graders.
17.   Distribute STAAR Incentive rewards at the end-of-year Pep Rally
Incentive Committee
June 7, 2013
STAAR Incentive prizes purchased with Incentive Committee funds
All students gather in the gymnasium on the last day of school to be present for the drawings for STAAR Incentive gifts. All students are entered once in the drawing. Students receive additional entries for every STAAR test passed at Level II (Satisfactory Performance), and additional entries beyond that for every STAAR test passed at Level III (Advanced Performance).

3 comments:

  1. Wow, you have been blogging like mad these last two weeks! The plan looks good. I got a feeling we are going be buzzing right along with all of the responsibilities we will be undertaking and I am expecting the time to fly by. Hey, it isn't a big deal but a few times you refer to your assessment as STAR but then later STAAR. Are those the same thing? We also administer this assessment and we share the results with our teachers so they can better plan to meet the reading levels of our students. It also explains some of the difficulties we experience with students that might not be able to handle the reading you give them. I think you have a pretty well rounded set of data you will be collecting, too!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think your plan looks fantastic. You were so thorough!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Travis, I have been, but I've been doing it on a bunch of those blogs listed over there to the left...not my own. Thanks for the good word on the plan, and yeah, it's all going to buzz. I already feel that vibration in my brain that signals overload, but we'll get through it. As far as the STAR-STAAR thing, no, they're not the same, unfortunately. The Great State of Texas, in its wisdom, decided to name the new state standardized assessment the State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness (STAAR). Never mind that that is the same pronunciation as one of the most popular standardized diagnostic/progress monitoring assessments on the market. Who will care? I can tell you, it makes my RtI meetings, ARDs, and 504 Evaluation meetings hell. I just distinguish by either saying "STAR" for the Renaissance Learning product or "STA-A-A-A-A-AR" for the state test. It's silly, but everyone gets the point. Unfortunately, both of these assessments are critical to what I am doing, so I'll be certain to print a statement differentiating between the two at the beginning of ARP write-up.
    And Jill, thank you. I hope I was thorough because I want to walk into the superintendent's office one day with this ARP under my arm and demand an overhaul of RtI. We'll see how it goes.

    ReplyDelete