Action Planning Template
|
||||
Goal: I will determine the extent to which
the overall performance of struggling readers be increased through the
implementation of a multi-faceted reading intervention program?
|
||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s)
Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start-End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
1.
Determine eligible students for the program
|
Mrs.
Shannon Allen, Principal; Mrs. Jenny Angelo, Reading Department Chair; Mrs.
Ava Batiste, Counselor; Mr. Jeffrey Farley, Reading Interventionist/ Researcher
|
May
2012-July 2012
|
STAAR
raw scores, STAR scaled scores
|
Students
who exhibited low performance on both assessments will be placed in the program.
Remaining spots will be filled based upon Fall 2012 Universal Screen (STAR)
data. Number of students selected for sample is held at 63 in order to
accommodate those new, incoming or previously unidentified low-performing
students. Cap is based on maintaining an approximately 1:18 (or less)
teacher-student ratio.
|
2.
Institute class periods during which the interven-tions
will take place
|
Mrs.
Shannon Allen Mrs. Ava Batiste, Mr. Jeffrey Farley
|
May
2012-June 2012
|
Master
Schedule
|
Evaluate
Master Schedule to assess the possibility of removing 8th grade
ELAR students to other teachers in order to make Mr. Farley’s class periods
available for Reading Improvement classes
|
3.
Conduct Universal Screen
|
Mr.
Jeffrey Farley, Reading Department teachers
|
August
31, 2012-September 7, 2012
|
Campus
STAR Reading subscription, computer labs (3 labs/3 days)
|
All
students on the campus will take the assessment in order to verify placement
of children from previous assessment data and to fill spots in the classes
with as many other students from the bottom of the field as the class
capacity allows. Look particularly at incoming 6th graders for
placement.
|
NOTE REGARDING UNIVERSAL SCREEN: In September 2012, a total of 811 students were tested. 26 students, from our total of 837 enrolled at that time, were not tested in the screen due to enrollment in Life Skills, Home-bound, or Alternative Campus Placement at the time of the screen. . |
||||
4.
Begin daily interventions using audio books
|
Mr.
Jeffrey Farley
|
September
6, 2012-April 24, 2013
|
Taped
books, PlayAways, cassette players, headphones, power (strips, cords, etc.),
Campus Accelerated Reader (AR) subscription
|
Students
will work four days each week (M-Th) reading for 40 minutes each day.
Remaining time will be spent documenting the day’s reading on the summary
bookmark created for that book. Student reading will be tracked through the
AR Reading Practice quizzes – point totals, average book level, and average
quiz score will be assessed and documented.
|
5.
Administer STAR Reading assessment weekly to monitor
progress
|
Mr.
Jeffrey Farley
|
September
14, 2012-May 3, 2013
|
Campus
STAR Reading subscription, computer lab (every Friday, all year – administer
STAR 2nd-4th Fridays of every month)
|
The
STAR assessment will be used to determine starting Zone of Proximal
Development (ZPD) in terms of AR Book Level to help students choose
appropriately comfortable/challenging independent reading material. Students
will also track their own scaled score from the weekly assessments on a paper
graph in their folder – this will help them self-assess their own progress
and drive them to keep reaching.
|
6.
Following analysis of Universal Screen data,
low-perform-ing sixth grade students are added to the program
|
Mr.
Jeffrey Farley, Mrs. Shannon Allen, Mrs. Ava Batiste
|
September
18, 2012
|
Master
Schedule, STAR Universal Screen data
|
Fourteen
new students from the sixth grade are entered into the program bringing the
total Tier II sample group to 77 students. These 77 students will receive
interventions and progress monitoring until either they achieve three
consecutive scaled scores at or above benchmark or the end of the school
year, whichever comes first.
|
7.
Administer Istation Indicators of Progress (ISIP)
assessment
|
Mr.
Jeffrey Farley
|
October
12, 2012-May 10, 2013
|
District
Istation subscription, computer labs (1st Friday of every month),
headphones
|
The
ISIP assessment will be a second diagnostic tool to help understand specific
problem areas for each child in the program. The assessment will also inform
the Istation practice platform so that each student receives interventions
appropriate to his or her level/area(s) of difficulty
|
8.
Begin taking AR Vocabulary quizzes immediately
following AR Reading Practice quizzes
|
Mr.
Jeffrey Farley
|
October
25, 2012-May 31, 2013
|
Campus
AR subscription
|
Based
on preliminary examination of ISIP data, many students are struggling
specifically with vocabulary and word analysis. While the vocabulary quizzes in AR are
based on the level of the book, and those book levels are often well-below
grade level, the vocabulary quiz offers another data point for the dashboard
and an opportunity to remediate students when performance of these
assessments is low.
|
9.
Administer Student Reading Survey
|
Mr.
Jeffrey Farley
|
November
2, 2012
|
Google
Survey modified from 2011 Concordia University Research study survey
component
|
I
will build the online survey using the CU survey component as a guide and
administer the online survey after weekly progress monitoring in the lab on
11/2/2012. Survey data will be assessed as immediately as possible to
determine whether factors within the students might need to be addressed
during the program.
|
10.
Begin using “Reading with ISIP” computer- based
intervention program
|
Mr.
Jeffrey Farley
|
November
2, 2012-May 31, 2013
|
District
Istation subscription, computer labs (every Friday of the school year)
|
Students
will spend any time after completing either the STAR or the ISIP on the
Istation reading practice platform. Performance in this environment will be
assessed at least every three weeks for grade reporting purposes and to
discover the nature of the students’ use and priority areas as determined by
performance in the practices.
|
11.
Administer Parent Survey
|
Mr.
Jeffrey Farley
|
November
9, 2012
|
Google
Survey or Survey Monkey survey
|
The
parent survey will focus on Istation, primarily, but also on the students’
attitudes toward school as perceived by those at home. With regard Istation,
I hope to learn whether parents are using the resource, how the feel about
it, and what would make it easier for them do so if they are not.
|
12.
Administer mid-year STAR Universal Screen
|
Mr.
Jeffrey Farley, Reading department teachers
|
January
7, 2013-January 18, 2013
|
Campus
STAR Reading subscription, computer labs (3 labs/3 days)
|
Mid-year
Universal Screen will look for students who may have dropped during the first
half of the year or entered the school during that time but after the initial
Screen. All students will, again, be compared against every other student on
the campus.
|
13.
Begin promoting STAAR Incentive program
|
Campus
Incentive Committee
|
January
7, 2013-April 26, 2013
|
Box
Tops for Education funding, School Dance & other special event funds to
purchase performance incentive prizes
|
Incentive
Committee will begin promoting STAAR Incentive giveaways to be drawn on the
last day of the school year with incentive drawing opportunities tied to
STAAR performance. This program will be used to motivate students in the
sample to redouble their efforts in the program and to achieve benchmark
scores in Progress Monitoring assessments.
|
14.
Administer STAAR Reading assessment
|
Entire
Marshall MS faculty
|
April
3, 2013 (8th grade) and April 24, 2013 (6th & 7th
grade)
|
State-provided
Assessment
|
The
STAAR Assessment will be one of the major, overall assessments of whether
students improved throughout the course of the year. By comparing scaled
scores with the 2012 scaled scores (to be reported in January 2013), we can
begin to assess overall improvement.
|
15.
Administer end-of-year STAR Universal Screen
|
Mr.
Jeffrey Farley, Reading department teachers
|
May
1, 2013-May 15, 2013
|
Campus
STAR Reading subscription, computer labs (3 labs/3 days)
|
End-of-year
Universal Screen will provide a second assessment of overall reading progress
based on scaled score, grade equivalency increases, and increases in
Instructional Reading Levels (IRLs). All students will, again, be compared
against every other student on the campus.
|
16.
Make recommend-dations for placement for 2013-2014
school year based upon preliminary STAAR data and Spring Universal Screen
data
|
Mr.
Jeffrey Farley, Mrs. Shannon Allen, Mrs. Ava Batiste
|
May
15, 2013-June 7, 2013
|
Disaggregated
STAAR data, STAR Universal Screen data, Istation data (where available),
Master Schedule
|
Reassess
Master Schedule to determine whether more sections of Reading Improvement are
necessary/possible. Analyze assessment data comparing STAAR Performance,
Spring Universal Screen data, and Istation data (most current, where
available). Assess number of slots in Reading Improvement classes for next
school year, determine need for returning students, and determine a
reasonable (large as possible) number of seats to save for incoming sixth
graders.
|
17.
Distribute STAAR
Incentive rewards at the end-of-year Pep Rally
|
Incentive
Committee
|
June
7, 2013
|
STAAR
Incentive prizes purchased with Incentive Committee funds
|
All
students gather in the gymnasium on the last day of school to be present for
the drawings for STAAR Incentive gifts. All students are entered once in the
drawing. Students receive additional entries for every STAAR test passed at
Level II (Satisfactory Performance), and additional entries beyond that for
every STAAR test passed at Level III (Advanced Performance).
|
I made this blog because I had to. It was an assignment for class. I look forward to the gratitude that I know will swell within me when I come to realize just how much I value this thing and how right they were in making me do it.
Saturday, November 3, 2012
NEW & IMPROVED - Same Great Taste, Higher Constitution!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wow, you have been blogging like mad these last two weeks! The plan looks good. I got a feeling we are going be buzzing right along with all of the responsibilities we will be undertaking and I am expecting the time to fly by. Hey, it isn't a big deal but a few times you refer to your assessment as STAR but then later STAAR. Are those the same thing? We also administer this assessment and we share the results with our teachers so they can better plan to meet the reading levels of our students. It also explains some of the difficulties we experience with students that might not be able to handle the reading you give them. I think you have a pretty well rounded set of data you will be collecting, too!
ReplyDeleteI think your plan looks fantastic. You were so thorough!
ReplyDeleteTravis, I have been, but I've been doing it on a bunch of those blogs listed over there to the left...not my own. Thanks for the good word on the plan, and yeah, it's all going to buzz. I already feel that vibration in my brain that signals overload, but we'll get through it. As far as the STAR-STAAR thing, no, they're not the same, unfortunately. The Great State of Texas, in its wisdom, decided to name the new state standardized assessment the State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness (STAAR). Never mind that that is the same pronunciation as one of the most popular standardized diagnostic/progress monitoring assessments on the market. Who will care? I can tell you, it makes my RtI meetings, ARDs, and 504 Evaluation meetings hell. I just distinguish by either saying "STAR" for the Renaissance Learning product or "STA-A-A-A-A-AR" for the state test. It's silly, but everyone gets the point. Unfortunately, both of these assessments are critical to what I am doing, so I'll be certain to print a statement differentiating between the two at the beginning of ARP write-up.
ReplyDeleteAnd Jill, thank you. I hope I was thorough because I want to walk into the superintendent's office one day with this ARP under my arm and demand an overhaul of RtI. We'll see how it goes.