Okay, folks. Here's my Action Plan Template. Let me know what you think when you get a chance. I'll be trolling the blogs later on tonight to check out yours and offer my two cents (for whatever two cents is worth anymore).
Action Planning
Template
|
||||
· Goal: I
will determine the extent to which the overall performance of struggling
readers be increased through the implementation of a multi-faceted reading
intervention program?
|
||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
Determine
eligible students for the program
|
Mrs.
Shannon Allen, Principal
|
May
2012-July 2012
|
STAAR raw
scores, STAR scaled scores
|
Students
who exhibited low performance on both assessments will be placed in the
program. Remaining spots will be filled based upon Fall 2012 Universal Screen
(STAR) data
|
Institute
class periods during which the interventions will take place
|
Mrs.
Shannon Allen; Mrs. Ava Batiste, Counselor; Mr. Jeffrey Farley, ELAR Teacher
|
May
2012-June 2012
|
Master
Schedule
|
Evaluate
Master Schedule to assess the possibility of removing 8th grade
ELAR students to other teachers in order to make Mr. Farley’s class periods
available for Reading Improvement classes
|
Conduct
Universal Screen
|
Mr. Jeffrey
Farley, Reading Department
|
August 31,
2012-September 7, 2012
|
Campus STAR
Reading subscription, computer labs (3 labs/3 days)
|
All
students on the campus (except Life Skills students) will take the assessment
in order to verify placement of children from previous assessment data and to
fill spots in the classes with as many other students from the bottom of the
field as the class capacity allows. Look particularly at incoming 6th
graders for placement.
|
Begin daily
interventions using audio books
|
Mr. Jeffrey
Farley
|
September
6, 2012-April 24, 2013
|
Taped
books, PlayAways, cassette players, headphones, power (strips, cords, etc.),
Campus Accelerated Reader (AR) subscription
|
Students
will work four days each week (M-Th) reading for 40 minutes each day.
Remaining time will be spent documenting the day’s reading on the summary
bookmark created for that book. Student reading will be tracked through the
AR Reading Practice quizzes – point totals, average book level, and average
quiz score will be assessed and documented.
|
Administer
STAR Reading assessment weekly to monitor progress
|
Mr. Jeffrey
Farley
|
September
14, 2012-May 3, 2013
|
Campus STAR
Reading subscription, computer lab (every Friday, all year – administer STAR
2nd-4th Fridays of every month)
|
The
STAR assessment will be used to determine starting Zone of Proximal
Development (ZPD) in terms of AR Book Level to help students choose
appropriately comfortable/challenging independent reading material. Students
will also track their own scaled score from the weekly assessments on a paper
graph in their folder – this will help them self-assess their own progress
and drive them to keep reaching.
|
Administer
Istation Indicators of Progress (ISIP) assessment
|
Mr. Jeffrey
Farley
|
October 12,
2012-May 10, 2013
|
District
Istation subscription, computer labs (1st Friday of every month),
headphones
|
The
ISIP assessment will be a second diagnostic tool to help understand specific
problem areas for each child in the program. The assessment will also inform
the Istation practice platform so that each student receives interventions
appropriate to his or her level/area(s) of difficulty
|
Administer
Student Reading Survey
|
Mr. Jeffrey
Farley
|
November 2,
2012
|
Google
Survey modified from 2011 Concordia University Research study survey
component
|
I
will build the online survey using the CU survey component as a guide and
administer the online survey after weekly progress monitoring in the lab on
11/2/2012. Survey data will be assessed as immediately as possible to
determine whether factors within the students might need to be addressed
during the program.
|
Begin using
“Reading with ISIP” computer-based intervention program
|
Mr. Jeffrey
Farley
|
November 2,
2012-May 31, 2013
|
District
Istation subscription, computer labs (every Friday of the school year)
|
Students
will spend any time after completing either the STAR or the ISIP on the
Istation reading practice platform. Performance in this environment will be
assessed at least every three weeks for grade reporting purposes and to discover
the nature of the students’ use and priority areas as determined by
performance in the practices.
|
Begin
taking AR Vocabulary quizzes immediately following AR Reading Practice
quizzes
|
Mr. Jeffrey
Farley
|
October 25,
2012-May 31, 2013
|
Campus AR
subscription
|
Based
on preliminary examination of ISIP data, many students are struggling
specifically with vocabulary and word analysis. While the vocabulary quizzes in AR are
based on the level of the book, and those book levels are often well-below
grade level, the vocabulary quiz offers another data point for the dashboard
and an opportunity to remediate students when performance of these
assessments is low.
|
Administer
mid-year STAR Universal Screen
|
Mr. Jeffrey
Farley, Reading department
|
January 1,
2013-January 15, 2013
|
Campus STAR
Reading subscription, computer labs (3 labs/3 days)
|
Mid-year
Universal Screen will look for students who may have dropped during the first
half of the year or entered the school during that time but after the initial
Screen. All students will, again, be compared against every other student on
the campus.
|
Administer
STAAR Reading assessment
|
Entire
Marshall MS faculty
|
April 3,
2013 (8th grade) and April 24, 2013 (6th & 7th
grade)
|
State-provided
Assessment
|
The
STAAR Assessment will be one of the major, overall assessments of whether
students improved throughout the course of the year. By comparing scaled
scores with the 2012 scaled scores (to be reported in January 2013), we can
begin to assess overall improvement.
|
Administer
end-of-year STAR Universal Screen
|
Mr. Jeffrey
Farley, Reading department
|
May 1,
2013-May 15, 2013
|
Campus STAR
Reading subscription, computer labs (3 labs/3 days)
|
End-of-year
Universal Screen will provide a second assessment of overall reading progress
based on scaled score, grade equivalency increases, and increases in
Instructional Reading Levels (IRLs). All students will, again, be compared
against every other student on the campus.
|
Your plan looks great! It looks like you really took your time thinking through the evaluation process. I really like the idea of students keeping track of their own progress on their graph paper. I did that with my 4th graders on their reading and math benchmarks. At that age, I'm not sure they really fully comprehend what grades mean, but it helps for them to have a visual and knowing that they had to get over that line. Good luck on your action research journey!
ReplyDeleteYour Plan looks really nice. I am still working on mine as we speak. Taking a look at yours as helped me narrow a focus as I am all over the place right now. I can tell you thought this through thoroughly.(LOL that was a mouth full) I like that your focus in on reading because in the district I work in reading is a priority as well. I really believe you will have fun time with this research.
ReplyDeleteWhat a great job you did on your plan
ReplyDeleteI am doing my action research on Accelerated Reader too.
I wanted to suggest that perhaps you include parents and students in your plan I just realized today that they are a key to it being successful.
I also wanted your expert opinion on how many word in a year a sixth grader should be reading in AR if they are reading at about a third to fourth grade level. I am comparing active vs. passive participation in Accelerated reader.
I would really appreciate if you would comment on my blog
http://colleenjros.blogspot.com
Does your school not have Reading 180? We have that here at Odom for reading intervention...
ReplyDeleteWell, Shannon, we do have an old, antiquated version of Read 180, but we didn't get in on the big purchase that several of our middle schools made a year or two ago to upgrade to the Enterprise version of the program. We don't receive Title I funding (we are short by 1% or 2%), so we couldn't afford the whole ball of wax. See, when you implement Read 180 as a full-blown reading intervention, there are several components to it: leveled books on tape and time for reading them, lessons the teacher can use to address specific needs with individuals or small groups, the interactive computer program, and so on. The only component of that that we have on our campus is the computer part. And since that big purchase, the licenses owned by the district were redistributed throughout the district to all the middle school campuses whether they were using the program or not. Thus, you have campuses with very small populations who have more licenses than they have kids, and then you have larger campuses like yours and mine who have not got enough licenses to assign all of the children who need the program. No, we have so many kids who are below benchmark that Read 180 is not a reasonable solution for more than a handful of them. Our dyslexia teacher still uses the programs for her kids, and I think that Special Education might still be using it, but if you look just at my rolls, you'll see that I have more kids in Reading Improvement classes than we have licenses for the program.
ReplyDeleteMr. Farley, you have an awesome plan laid out ans I can't wait to see how the students on your campus benefit from your doing this research project. My campus is doing something with Compass Learning and Read 180 and the Sucess Maker program. I'm looking forward to hearing more from your blog.
ReplyDelete